Perhaps you're right that I have a "goldfish memory". I've learned my lesson about you multiple times, and yet I keep coming back, taking nothing to heart.
Exactly. We've had this same song and dance for years and you never learn, never incorporate anything new into your arguments and deny deny deny anything big or small.
Well, this isn't really to convince you or even change, I don't believe I ever can. However, I can at least expound for the peanut gallery or push-back when you make a nonsense claims and try to cynically use principles you'd betray.
(To repeat VeteranAdventureHobo)
Non-sequitur appeal to emotion. You constantly pin blame on the court for putting a flawed ruling out of its misery, but not on Congress for not taking advantage of its 49-year lifespan to instill abortion into federal law. It only took seven years for gay marriage to be granted de jure federal recognition; 49 years should've been plenty, yes?
Weak shifting of responsibility, and an accidental acknowledgement that you truly don't care of the consequences of it, which undermines your own constant appeals to emotion of 'freedom' and 'the people". 'Legalists' arguments like this is also the one I encounter most when arguing against Muslim fundamentalism who say that it justifies their arguments, by the way.
"You could, so you did", only works in a two-party state where failure to counter you is a fault of the other party. I do not subscribe to this two-party dichotomy, so I say you lot take responsibility for what you do. Ironically, the rational response to what the GOP has done is widespread and complete distrust of it and it's agenda, so it can't do this again. Exactly, what you're reaping with Project 2025.
A law that's currently being challenged and is very likely going to die in the court system. It's obviously unconstitutional.
I'll believe it when I see it, and laws are passed against trying the same thing again. Don't rely on trust in institutions which the GOP has itself weakened.
False equivalency, it was an assassination attempt, not a mere threat.
So you finally admit you made a threat? I'm not the one who's done an assassination attempt by the way, but of the two of us you're the one who liked making threats and violence, until suddenly it comes home to roost. My point was to you live in the climate you partially contributed to.
Actually, I remember you being right pissed that politicians dare be threatened, which makes your implicit defense of an assassination attempt hypocritical, and your accusations of hypocrisy towards me an example of projection.
Oh yes, I was very much pissed about that.
Misconstruing an argument (dare I say, straw-man if we're throwing fallacies at each other), when did I defend Trump's assassination attempt? I think it's a good thing that Trump survived, and that the shooter is dead (even if not apprehended so we don't know his reason why, that's fertile soil for conspiracy) I also say Trump and his base have stupidly helped create the climate of fear, it's congruent.
Voting is not a threat (and you did call voting a threat), threatening to gun someone down is, learn to tell the difference !
If anything, I hate all terrorists, I don't cherry-pick on when it's acceptable. You liked to larp as a revolutionary (or terrorist) when it's convenient for you, when it suits your narrative. Deny it as you always will.
Constantly trying to just repeat any accusations I make to you back to me, doesn't actually work as well when there's a pattern of behaviour
Also, to repeat a bit you skipped:
We still don't know why that shooter tried to do what he did. Democratic plant, QAnon devotee, Republican 'deep-state' or your regular nutjob
It's interesting you tried to connect criticisms of Project 2025 when we don't actually know why he did what he did. It might even be said you instrumentalized the assassination attempt for cynical political gain. What's next, criticizing the tax policy makes you a terrorist (hm, considering how America was founded)? If anything, that's probably contributed to draining the decorum and respect that should surround an attempted assassination attempt (even more than the gallows humour).
As I said, all this bullshit about "Project 2025" is partially responsible. There's a lot of factors at play, and what Trump has genuinely said and done is certainly one of them. Emphasis on "one of them".
Hm, I think this is the first time you've even admitted to Trump's rhetoric contributing. I guess you're really desperate to bury Project 2025 & it's theocratic elements, aren't you? Have to be desperate that you're even throwing this bone. Maybe he and his base (and anyone in love with 'strong-men') like you can learn now why sometimes even politicians who want to "win" admit fault when they have to or why they try to maintain standards. Or back-off when there's backlash.
I'd say the same thing I've said to all extremists, get your nutcases in order, cool down the rhetoric and actually crackdown on the people responsible for plans such as project 2025 (actual actions), don't make the democrats solve your messes. That would be a step-off the ledge.